The cost of dental care varies enormously across healthcare systems. There is no single figure that can accurately describe the average annual dental spending per citizen, because prices, frequency of treatment, public coverage and out-of-pocket payments differ substantially from country to country.
A more useful indicator is out-of-pocket dental spending, meaning the amount directly paid by households. Across OECD countries, dental care accounts for a significant share of direct healthcare expenditure, with major differences between national systems.
Contents
Italy, France and Germany: three different approaches
Italy, France and Germany illustrate the differences within Europe particularly well. In Italy, dental care is largely provided through the private sector. The public healthcare system covers certain services and specific categories of patients, but most dental treatment for adults is paid directly by patients or through supplementary insurance.
France and Germany, by contrast, provide significantly broader coverage through their mandatory healthcare or insurance systems. Coverage is generally strongest for medically necessary treatments, while prosthetics, orthodontics and more complex procedures may require additional insurance or greater patient contributions.
According to the OECD, France and Germany are among the countries where more than half of dental expenditure is covered by public schemes or compulsory insurance, making their systems substantially different from Italy’s.
Northern Europe: stronger protection for children
The Nordic countries generally provide particularly extensive support for children and young people. Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland offer broad public coverage during childhood and adolescence. For adults, however, public support varies according to age, medical conditions, income and the type of treatment involved.
The result is a system in which prevention and treatment during childhood receive significantly broader coverage than routine dental care for adults.
Spain and Portugal: a strong private component
In Spain, public dental coverage for adults remains relatively limited, resulting in significant reliance on direct payments.
Portugal has a more mixed model, with the public system covering selected treatments and targeted programmes, while a considerable share of dental care is provided privately.
As a result, direct costs can become substantial, particularly for prosthetics, implants, orthodontics and treatments that fall outside public coverage.
United States: insurance is crucial
In the United States, dental care is largely separate from general healthcare coverage. Many adults rely on private dental insurance, often provided through employers, while others pay directly for treatment. Medicare generally provides very limited dental coverage, while Medicaid coverage varies significantly between states.
The result is a substantial difference between patients with comprehensive insurance and those who must bear most or all of the cost themselves.
Canada: a new public safety net
Canada is currently expanding public dental coverage through the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP). The federal programme targets residents who do not have private dental insurance and meet specific income requirements. For 2026-27, eligibility is generally based on an adjusted family net income below dollars 90,000.
Coverage varies according to household income. Families below dollars 70,000 can receive 100% coverage of eligible services at the programme’s established fees, while coverage falls to 60% for incomes between dollars 70,000 and dollars 79,999 and to 40% between dollars 80,000 and 89,999. Additional charges may still apply.
By April 2026, the Canadian government said that more than 6.5 million people could already access the programme.
Japan: universal health insurance
Japan represents a particularly interesting model. Dental treatment is incorporated into the country’s universal health insurance system. For covered procedures, patients normally pay a share of the cost, while the remainder is financed through the insurance system.
Basic dental care is therefore integrated into universal healthcare, while treatments, materials or procedures outside the standard package can generate additional costs.
South Korea: public coverage and patient contributions
South Korea also operates a national health insurance system covering selected dental services. Coverage depends on the treatment, the patient’s age and individual circumstances. Preventive care and certain treatments for specific population groups can receive significant public support, while other procedures remain substantially dependent on patient payments.
The Korean model therefore occupies a middle ground between the most comprehensive European systems and predominantly private models.
Singapore: individual savings and targeted subsidies
In Singapore, healthcare combines insurance, individual medical savings and government support. Dental care continues to involve substantial direct payments, while the government provides subsidies and targeted programmes, particularly for vulnerable groups and older people.
Unlike universal European models, the system places greater emphasis on individual financial resources and insurance coverage.
China: limited coverage for complex treatment
In China, public health insurance covers some medical services, but dental coverage is generally more limited than coverage for ordinary medical treatment. Direct payment therefore remains important, particularly for complex procedures such as orthodontics, implants and prosthetics.
There are also significant regional and socioeconomic differences, with access to private dental services substantially greater in major urban centres and among higher-income households.
The Gulf countries: different systems for citizens and expatriates
There is no single dental-care model across the Gulf. The United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region combine public healthcare, mandatory insurance and private coverage. A key distinction often exists between citizens and foreign workers.
Citizens can benefit from extensive public programmes, while expatriates are more dependent on employer-provided health insurance or private policies.
Consequently, the amount actually paid by a patient can vary dramatically, even within the same country.
How much does dental care really cost?
The international comparison shows why the price of a dental procedure alone is not enough.
An Italian patient may pay a large share of a treatment directly, while a French or German patient may have a substantial portion reimbursed through compulsory insurance. In the United States, the decisive factor may be the quality of private insurance. In Canada, household income now plays a major role in determining public coverage. In Japan, the key factor is whether the procedure falls within the national health insurance system.
The most important question is therefore not simply how much a dental treatment costs, but how much of that cost ultimately remains with the patient.
The OECD data also show a strong relationship between income and access to dental care. In 2024, more than 8% of the population reported unmet dental care needs in Greece, Latvia and Iceland, while the proportion was below 1% in Germany, Hungary and the Netherlands.
The fundamental difference between national systems is therefore not simply the nominal price of dental treatment, but the ability of public healthcare or insurance schemes to absorb part of that cost and preserve access for economically vulnerable groups.
